Factual and Legal Impact of Affidavit Disclosure in Maintenance Proceedings: A Study in Light of Rajnesh v. Neha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53724/jmsg/v11n2.03Keywords:
Affidavit of Disclosure, Maintenance Proceedings, Rajnesh v. Neha, Section 144 BNSS, False Financial Disclosure, Perjury under BNS, Contempt of Court, Ex-parte Orders, Judicial ReformsAbstract
The concept of maintenance under Indian law embodies the social and constitutional obligation to ensure financial support to dependents who are unable to maintain themselves. With the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) which replaces the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the provision for maintenance has been retained under Section 144 of the BNSS, continuing the spirit of Section 125 of the former Code. The focal point of adjudicating maintenance claims remains the truthful disclosure of income, assets, and liabilities by both parties. In its landmark judgment Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India introduced a uniform format for filing affidavits of disclosure to curb manipulation, ensure transparency, and secure just maintenance orders.
This research titled “Factual and Legal Impact of Affidavit Disclosure in Maintenance Proceedings: A Study in Light of Rajnesh v. Neha” critically examines the evolution and continuing relevance of the affidavit-disclosure mechanism under the new procedural regime of the BNSS. It analyses how false or incomplete disclosures affect judicial determination of maintenance, and the consequent legal implications such as perjury under Section 227 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), contempt of court, and the setting aside of ex-parte orders obtained through suppression of facts.
The study adopts a doctrinal and analytical approach, reviewing judicial pronouncements from the Supreme Court and various High Courts post-Rajnesh v. Neha, along with evaluating the practical enforcement of affidavit requirements in Family Courts. It further explores whether the BNSS framework strengthens procedural compliance or merely re-enacts prior challenges under a new nomenclature. The research concludes that while the Rajnesh guidelines remain a vital judicial instrument ensuring fairness in maintenance litigation, the effective implementation under the BNSS will depend on statutory codification of affidavit obligations, judicial training, and accountability for false declarations.
References
Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324.
Rajnesh v. Neha [(2021) 2 SCC 324].
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma [(2015) 217 DLT 706].
Anju Garg v. Deepak Kumar Garg [2022 SCC OnLine Del 3471].
Kavita v. State of Maharashtra [2022 SCC OnLine Bom 132].
Rakesh Malhotra v. Krishna Malhotra [2022 SCC OnLine Del 4015].
Poonam Malik (2024) in her paper “Transparency in Maintenance Proceedings: Evaluating the Rajnesh Affidavit Model under the BNSS” (Journal of Indian Law and Society, Vol. 14, pp. 117–138).
Ranjana Kumari v. State of M.P. [2023 SCC OnLine MP 657].
Ankita Srivastava v. Ajay Srivastava [2023 SCC OnLine All 918].
in her article “Perjury and False Affidavits in Indian Family Law: A Need for Stronger Sanctions” (Indian Bar Review, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 201–219).
Law Commission of India, Report No. 252: Reforms in Family Law Procedures (2015).
Anuradha Joshi (2023), “False Disclosure and Gender Justice in Maintenance Proceedings” (University of Delhi).
Karan v. State of Punjab [2024 SCC OnLine P&H 1123].
Smt. Meenakshi v. Sanjay [2024 SCC OnLine Mad 2114].
Gupta, Radhika, “Perjury and False Affidavits in Indian Family Law: A Need for Stronger Sanctions,” Indian Bar Review, Vol. 51, No. 2 (2023), pp. 201–219.
Malik, Poonam, “Transparency in Maintenance Proceedings: Evaluating the Rajnesh Affidavit Model under the BNSS,” Journal of Indian Law and Society, Vol. 14 (2024), pp. 117–138.
Sinha, R. (2018). The Gendered Economics of Maintenance: Transparency and Judicial Discretion. National Law Journal, 6(1), 101-125.
Puneet Kaur v. Inderjit Singh Sawhney, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 4771 (Delhi High Court).
CaseMine. (n.d.). Puneet Kaur v. Inderjit Singh Sawhney: A Landmark Judgement. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., legal blog or database].
Vera Causa Legal. (n.d.). Maintenance Proceedings: A Case Law Analysis. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., legal commentary site].
Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324
Supreme Court Observer. (n.d.). Rajnesh v. Neha. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., academic legal database].
Cyril Amarchand Blogs. (2020, November 6). Supreme Court lays down guidelines for maintenance proceedings. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., law firm publication].
S.S. Rana & Co. (n.d.). Supreme Court’s Guidelines for Maintenance Proceedings. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., law firm website].
Aditi alias Mithi v. Jitesh Sharma, (2023) 1 SCC 779 (Supreme Court of India).
Indian Family Lawyers. (n.d.). Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Review Rajnesh vs Neha. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., legal news website].
Jain, P. (2022). Perjury in Family Courts: A Critical Analysis of Financial Disclosure. Journal of Indian Law Review, 15(2), 45-68.
Mukherjee, P. (2019). The Role of Sanctions in Family Court Procedure: Lessons from Affidavit Disclosure. Indian Journal of Civil Procedure, 14(1), 21-40.
Kaur, S. (2021). Procedural Justice in Family Law: Maintenance and Transparency. LexisNexis.
Himanshu v. State of MP, (2022) 7 SCC 779 (Supreme Court of India).
Singh, A. (2020). Criminal Prosecution for Perjury: A Toothless Tiger in Indian Courts. National Law Review, 9(4), 180-195.
Vasisht, R. (2023). Enforcement of Judicial Orders in India: Contempt and Compliance. Eastern Book Company.
Desai, A. (2021). Contempt Jurisdiction and the Judicial Enforcement of Financial Disclosure in Matrimonial Disputes. Legal Quarterly Review, 10(3), 88-105.
Ramamurthy, S. (2020). Maintenance Law: A Procedural Analysis of Disclosure in India. Journal of Indian Legal Studies, 12(3), 112-135.
SCC Online. (2024, March 27). Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available, e.g., legal news website].
BNS Section 227 - Giving false evidence. (n.d.). Devgan.in. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available].
Maheshwari & Co. (n.d.). Perjury and Preliminary Inquiries. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available].
Law, University of Kashmir. (n.d.). Unit-5 Contempt of Court. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available].
Ramamurthy, S. (2020). Maintenance Law: A Procedural Analysis of Disclosure in India. Journal of Indian Legal Studies, 12(3), 112-135.
NITI Aayog, DMEO. (2022). ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNANCE. Retrieved from [Source where this information is available].
Jain, P. (2022). Perjury in Family Courts: A Critical Analysis of Financial Disclosure. Journal of Indian Law Review, 15(2), 45-68.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
