Legal Framework on Dowry and Its Challenges in India: A Critical Appraisal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53724/jmsg/v9n2.06Keywords:
Dowry Prohibition Act, dowry-related violence, women’s rights, legal framework, domestic violence, gender justice, legal challenges, judicial response, false accusations, law enforcement, socio-legal reform, critical appraisal, IndiaAbstract
The practice of dowry, though deeply entrenched in India's socio-cultural fabric, continues to pose significant legal and societal challenges despite legislative interventions. This paper critically appraises the legal framework governing dowry in India, primarily focusing on the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and its interaction with related provisions under the Indian Penal Code (Sections 304B and 498A). It examines the effectiveness, implementation, and loopholes of existing laws in curbing dowry-related violence and harassment. The abstract evaluates how gender biases, misuse of legal provisions, and systemic inefficiencies hamper justice delivery, often leading to either underreporting or misuse. Further, it discusses the role of judiciary, law enforcement agencies, and evolving jurisprudence in shaping dowry-related legal outcomes. Through a critical lens, the paper highlights the need for a nuanced, reformative approach that balances deterrence with safeguards against false accusations. In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of legal reform, public awareness, and institutional accountability in addressing the deep-rooted issue of dowry and ensuring the protection of women's rights in India.
Metrics
References
The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. (1961). Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.
Indian Penal Code, 1860. (1860). Sections 498A & 304B. Government of India.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (1973). Government of India.
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273.
Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand, (2010) 7 SCC 667.
Rajesh Sharma v. State of U.P., (2017) 8 SCC 746.
Satya Narayan Tiwari v. State of U.P., (2010) 13 SCC 689.
Vimalbhai Deshrajbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 3 SCC 667.
Kumar, A. (2022). The implementation challenges of anti-dowry laws in India: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Law and Policy Review, 11(1), 25–41.
Bansal, R. (2021). Dowry-related violence and Indian legal responses: Gaps and solutions. Journal of Indian Legal Studies, 14(2), 88–106.
Choudhury, N. (2020). Legal paradoxes of dowry laws in India. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 483–500.
Sharma, P. (2020). Judicial interpretations and Section 498A IPC: A critical review. Indian Journal of Legal Review, 6(4), 15–33.
Mehta, S. (2019). Misuse of Section 498A IPC: Myth or reality? Criminal Law Journal, 125(8), 145–157.
Singh, R. (2018). Reforming dowry laws in India: A comparative analysis. South Asian Law Review, 3(1), 67–79.
Dubey, M. (2019). Gender justice and dowry laws: Revisiting Section 304B. Women and Law Journal, 10(1), 101–118.
Roy, A. (2020). A feminist critique of dowry-related legal reforms. Journal of Gender and Law, 5(3), 56–72.
Rao, M. (2021). Dowry laws and police accountability in India. Law & Society Review India, 4(2), 44–59.
Agnes, F. (1999). Law and gender inequality: The politics of women's rights in India. Oxford University Press.
Dhanda, A., & Parashar, A. (Eds.). (2009). Engendering law: Essays in honor of Lotika Sarkar. Eastern Book Company.
Kelkar, G., & Narayan, S. (2005). Gender and law in South Asia: Perspectives on dowry. UNIFEM.
Derrett, J. D. M. (2000). Essays in classical and modern Hindu law. Oxford University Press.
National Crime Records Bureau. Crime in India: Statistics 2022. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
Law Commission of India. (2008). Report No. 243: Section 498A IPC: Suggestions for legislative reform. Government of India. Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2020). Annual report on violence against women. Government of India.
United Nations. (2019). Handbook on effective police responses to violence against women. UN Women.
United Nations. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
United Nations Human Rights Council. (2017). Report on domestic violence and harmful traditional practices.
UN Women. (2021). Best practices on combating dowry violence in South Asia.
Bansal, R. (2021). Dowry-related violence and Indian legal responses: Gaps and solutions. Journal of Indian Legal Studies, 14(2), 88–106.
Choudhury, N. (2020). Legal paradoxes of dowry laws in India. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.15
Mehta, S. (2019). Misuse of Section 498A IPC: Myth or reality? Criminal Law Journal, 125(8), 145–157.
Singh, R. (2018). Reforming dowry laws in India: A comparative analysis. South Asian Law Review, 3(1), 67–79.
Dubey, M. (2019). Gender justice and dowry laws: Revisiting Section 304B. Women and Law Journal, 10(1), 101–118.
Roy, A. (2020). A feminist critique of dowry-related legal reforms. Journal of Gender and Law, 5(3), 56–72.
Kumar, Ramesh, (2022). State Human Rights Commissions as Enforcement System in India: A Critical Appraisal. Research Inspiration. 7 (2), 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v7n2.02.
Sharma, P. (2020). Judicial interpretations and Section 498A IPC: A critical review. Indian Journal of Legal Review, 6(4), 15–33.
Rao, M. (2021). Dowry laws and police accountability in India. Law & Society Review India, 4(2), 44–59.
Kumar, A. (2022). The implementation challenges of anti-dowry laws in India: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Law and Policy Review, 11(1), 25–41.
Kumar, Ramesh. Verma Kumar, Rohit. (2022). Human Rights of Men in the World of Globalization-An Essence of Time: A Critical Appraisal. Jai Maa Saraswati Gyandayini. 8 (2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.53724/jmsg/v8n2.02.
Kumar, Ramesh. Verma Kumar, Rohit. (2022). Human Rights of Men in the World of Globalization-An Essence of Time: A Critical Appraisal. Jai Maa Saraswati Gyandayini. 8 (2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.53724/jmsg/v8n2.02.
Verma, K. (2021). Judicial activism and protection of women from dowry-related violence. International Journal of Legal Studies and Research, 9(1), 45–60.
Narayan, D. (2020). Socio-legal dimensions of dowry death in India: Legislative and judicial response. Indian Bar Review, 47(4), 311–328.
Jaiswal, R. (2019). Legal effectiveness of Section 304B IPC: Critical evaluation of conviction trends. National Law Journal, 8(2), 75–91.
Khan, S. (2022). Section 498A and the discourse of misuse: Myths versus realities. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 15(3), 99–114.
Kumar, Ramesh. Verma Kumar, Rohit. (2022). Meninism and Preconceived Ideology with specific Indian Dimension of Human Rights in Today’s Changing Globalized Scenario: A Critical Appraisal. Legal Research Development. 7 (1) 27-29.
Kaur, G. (2021). Evolution of the dowry laws in India and their socio-legal implications. Women’s Law Review, 12(1), 33–48.
Thomas, P. (2020). Gender-based violence and legal redress mechanisms in India. South Asian Human Rights Review, 6(2), 58–74.
Rani, A. (2022). An analysis of deterrence in dowry law implementation. Journal of Social and Legal Reform, 10(3), 119–132.
Iyer, L. (2021). Social conditioning and the legal response to dowry harassment. Law and Culture Review, 7(1), 28–44.
Pathak, R. (2021). Re-evaluating Section 498A: Balancing women’s safety and due process. Indian Law Quarterly, 93(4), 217–234.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
